<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
	<META HTTP-EQUIV="CONTENT-TYPE" CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
	<TITLE></TITLE>
	<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Namo WebEditor v4.0">
	<META NAME="CREATED" CONTENT="20040107;18254800">
	<META NAME="CHANGED" CONTENT="20040216;22154700">
	<STYLE>
	<!--
		@page { size: 21.59cm 27.94cm; margin-left: 1.06cm; margin-right: 2.57cm; margin-top: 2.54cm; margin-bottom: 2.54cm }
		P { margin-bottom: 0.21cm }
	-->
	</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY LANG="en-US">
<div align="center">
	<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
		<tr>
			<td>
<p align="center" style="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<b><font size="4">India One and Indivisible</font></b></p>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<BR>
</P>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>INDIA is one and indivisible, culturally and
spiritually; politically too she must be one and indivisible and is,
as a matter of fact, already on the way towards that consummation, in
spite of appearances to the contrary. It has got to be so, if India
is to be strong and powerful, if her voice is to be heard in the
comity of nations, if she is to fulfil her mission in the world.</FONT></P>
			<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
&nbsp;</P>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>It is no use laying stress on distinctions and
differences: we must, on the contrary, put all emphasis upon the
funda&shy;mental unity, upon the demand and necessity for a dynamic
unity. Naturally there are diverse and even contradictory elements in
the make-up of a modern nation. France, for example, was not one, but
many to start with and for long. We know of the mortal feud between
the Bourguignons and the Armagnacs and the struggle among the Barons
generally, some even siding with foreigners against their own
country&shy;men (an Indian parallel we have in the story of
Prithwiraj and Jayachand), poor Jeanne d'Arc lamenting over the 'much
pity' that was in sweet France. There were several rival languages –
Breton, Gascon, Proven&ccedil;al, besides the French of Isle de
France. Apart from these provincial or regional rivalries there were
schisms on religious grounds – Huguenots and Catholics, Jansenists
and Arians were flying at each other's throat and made of France a
veritable bedlam of confusion and chaos. Well, all that was beaten
down and smoothed under the steam-roller of a strong centralised
invincible spirit of France, one and indivisible and inexorable, that
worked itself out through Jeanne d'Arc and Francis the First and
Henry the Great and Richelieu and Napoleon. But all nations have the
same story. And it is too late now in the day to start</FONT><BR>
			</P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="border-bottom:1px solid black; padding-top:0cm; padding-right:0cm; padding-bottom:0.07cm; padding-left:0cm; border-top-style:none; border-right-style:none; border-left-style:none; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>Page – 90</FONT><BR>
			</P>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY style="line-height: 150%; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0"><FONT SIZE=3>explaining
the nature and origin of nationhood; it was done long ago by Mazzini
and by Renan and once for all.</FONT></P>
			<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY style="line-height: 150%; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0">&nbsp;</P>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>Indeed, what we see rampant in India today is the
mediaeval spirit. This reversion to an older-an extinct, we ought to
have been able to say-type of mentality is certainly a fall, a
lowering of the collective consciousness. It<B> </B>bas got to be
remedied and set right. Whatever the motive forces that lie at the
back of the movement, motives of fear or despair or class interest or
parochial loyalty, motives of idealism, misguided and ob&shy;scurantist,
they have to be taken by the horns and dominated and eliminated. A
breath of modernism, some pure air of clear perception and knowledge
and wider consciousness must blow through the congested hectic
atmosphere of the Indian body politic.</FONT></P>
			<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
&nbsp;</P>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>It<B> </B>will do no good to anyone to try to Balkanise
India. The Balkan malady is no longer tolerated even in its homeland;
it cannot be transported to India in this century and after this
Great War. To be and remain free and strong and invincible, India
must be and remain indivisible. The strength of the United States of
America, of the United Soviets of the Russias, of the British
Commonwealth <I><FONT FACE="Arial Narrow, sans-serif">(</FONT>pace<FONT FACE="Arial Narrow, sans-serif">
</FONT></I>Churchill) lies precisely in each one of them being a
large unified aggregate, all members pooling their resources
together. India cannot main&shy;tain her freedom, nor utilise her
freedom to its utmost effectivity unless she is one and indivisible.
The days of small peoples, of isolated independence are gone – gone
for ever even like Thebes and Nineveh, like Kosala of Dasarathi and
Mathura of Yadupati.</FONT></P>
			<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
&nbsp;</P>
<P ALIGN=JUSTIFY STYLE="text-indent:0.34cm; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>India can be and is to be a federation of autonomous
units. But then we must very carefully choose or find out the units,
those that are real units and not fractions (especially irrational
fractions) and at the same time lay as much stress on federa&shy;tion
as on autonomy. To choose or create units on the basis of religion or
race or caste or creed, that is exactly what we mean by
irrationalism, in other words, mediaevalism. The Units must be, on
one side, geographical wholes, and, on the other, cultural (or
spiritual – not religious) wholes.</FONT><BR>
			</P>
<P ALIGN=CENTER STYLE="border-bottom:1px solid black; text-indent:0.34cm; padding-top:0cm; padding-right:0cm; padding-bottom:0.07cm; padding-left:0cm; border-top-style:none; border-right-style:none; border-left-style:none; line-height:150%; margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0">
<FONT SIZE=3>Page – 91</FONT></P>
<P ALIGN="right" style="line-height: 150%; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0">
<a title="Home" href="-00_-Content"><img src="/Nolini/Volume-1/_Gif_Image/house01_green.gif" width="28" height="23" border="0" alt="house06_white.gif"></a></P>
<div align="right"> 
	<p style="line-height: 150%; margin-top: 0; margin-bottom: 0"> </div>
			</td>
		</tr>
	</table>
</div>
</BODY>
</HTML>